C2 intralaminar screw placement: a quantitative anatomical and morphometric evaluation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIM To investigate the feasibility of placing a screw in the C2 lamina and evaluate the reliability of the surface of the dorsal arch of C2 as a landmark for determining the optimal site of screw entry. MATERIAL AND METHODS 88 adult human C2 spines were used. Seven measurements were determined for screw entry points, trajectories, and lengths for placement of intralaminar screws. RESULTS The average width of right C2 lamina (1/3 upper segment) was 2.6 mm (1.2 to 4.1 mm). The average width of left C2 lamina (1/3 upper segment) was 2.6 mm (1 to 4 mm). The average width of right C2 lamina (1/3 middle segment) was 4.9 mm (2.6 to 6.8 mm). The average width of left C2 lamina (1/3 middle segment) was 4.9 mm (2.3 to 7.6 mm). The average width of right C2 lamina (1/3 lower segment) was 5.7 mm (3.3 to 8.2 mm). The average width of left C2 lamina (1/3 lower segment) was 5.8 mm (2.2 to 9.6 mm). CONCLUSION The width of the upper one-third of C2 lamina is not appropriate for the placement of intralaminar screws. On the other hand, the width of the middle and lower one-third of C2 lamina is more convenient for intralaminar screw delivery.
منابع مشابه
Morphometric Analysis and Classification of the Cross-Sectional Shape of the C2 Lamina
A thorough understanding of the morphology of the lamina of the second cervical vertebra (C2) is important for safe C2 translaminar screw placement. Although anatomical characteristics of the C2 lamina have been widely documented, individual differences in morphology have not been addressed. The aim of this study was to morphometrically analyze the cross-sectional shape of the C2 lamina and cla...
متن کاملSimultaneous Use of Both Bilateral Intralaminar and Pedicle Screws for C2 Stabilization
Four patients underwent stabilization surgery using both bilateral C2 pedicle screw (PS) and intralaminar screw (LS). Neural and vascular injury resulting from incorrect screw placement was assessed using computed tomography (CT). The evaluation of bone union was assessed by lateral flexion-extension X-ray films and CT. The symptoms were improved in all patients. There were no intraoperative co...
متن کاملAccuracy of the freehand technique for 3 fixation methods in the C-2 vertebrae.
OBJECT Intraoperative imaging often does not provide adequate visualization to ensure safe placement of screws. Therefore, the authors investigated the accuracy of a freehand technique for placement of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar screws in C-2. METHODS Sixteen cadaveric specimens were instrumented freehand by 2 experienced cervical spine surgeons with either a pars or pedicle screw, and b...
متن کاملBiomechanical Evaluation of Unilateral Versus Bilateral C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Intralaminar Fixation
STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical, cadaveric study. OBJECTIVES To compare the relative stiffness of unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar fixation to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar constructs. METHODS The biomechanical integrity of a unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw construct was compared to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intr...
متن کاملC1 posterior arch screw as an auxiliary anchor in posterior reconstruction for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with type II odontoid fracture: a case report and review of the literature
INTRODUCTION Although pedicle or lateral mass screws are usually chosen to fix atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability, there is an increased risk for vertebral artery (VA) injury when used in patients with bone or arterial anomalies or osteoporotic bone. Here we report the C1 posterior arch screw as a new technique for upper cervical fixation. CASE DESCRIPTION A 90-year-old man complained of upper ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Turkish neurosurgery
دوره 19 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009